How LLC Owners Save on Taxes in 2026

Tax Intelligence Strategy Library Cost Segregation IRC §168 / §168(k) Real Estate Updated April 2026

Cost Segregation Study — Complete Practitioner Guide

How to accelerate $50,000–$500,000+ in depreciation deductions for real estate clients: component reclassification, 100% bonus depreciation under OBBBA, passive activity rules, look-back studies, and state conformity issues.

100%
Bonus depreciation restored (OBBBA 2026)
20–40%
Typical reclassification rate (commercial)
5:1–10:1
Typical ROI on study cost
§168(k)
IRC authority (bonus depreciation)
Verified by Licensed CPA — April 2026 IRS Notice 2026-11 Reviewed — 100% Bonus Depreciation Confirmed OBBBA Impact Reviewed — Permanent 100% Bonus Depreciation State Conformity Table Updated April 2026

What Is a Cost Segregation Study?

A cost segregation study is an engineering-based tax analysis that identifies and reclassifies components of a real property from the standard 39-year (commercial) or 27.5-year (residential) depreciation period to shorter recovery periods of 5, 7, or 15 years. By accelerating depreciation into the early years of ownership, cost segregation dramatically increases current-year deductions, improves cash flow, and reduces the present value of the tax liability over the holding period.

The strategy is grounded in IRC §168, which governs the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS), and IRC §168(k), which provides for additional first-year (bonus) depreciation. The IRS has explicitly endorsed cost segregation as a legitimate tax planning strategy and published its own Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide (ATG) in 2004 to guide both taxpayers and IRS examiners on the proper methodology.

The fundamental insight behind cost segregation is that a building is not a single asset — it is a collection of thousands of individual components, each with its own proper recovery period. A standard depreciation schedule treats the entire building as one asset with a 39-year life. A cost segregation study disaggregates the building into its component parts and assigns each the correct, shorter recovery period where applicable.

The 2026 Bonus Depreciation Landscape — OBBBA Changes Everything

The passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) in 2025 fundamentally changed the cost segregation calculus for 2026 and beyond. Prior to OBBBA, bonus depreciation was on a scheduled the prior phase-down (now eliminated by OBBBA) under TCJA, but the OBBBA (Public Law 119-21, signed July 4, 2025) permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation for qualifying property placed in service after January 19, 2025.

IRS Notice 2026-11, issued in January 2026, provides interim guidance on the OBBBA bonus depreciation rules. The notice confirms that property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025 (the date of OBBBA enactment) qualifies for 100% bonus depreciation under the restored IRC §168(k). This means that all personal property (5-year and 7-year) and 15-year land improvements identified in a cost segregation study can be deducted in full in the year the property is placed in service.

Critical Practitioner Note — OBBBA Transition Rules

IRS Notice 2026-11 includes important transition rules for property placed in service in 2025 before OBBBA enactment. For property placed in service in 2025 before January 19, 2025, the 100% bonus depreciation (restored by OBBBA for property placed in service after Jan 19, 2025) rate applies. For property placed in service on or after January 19, 2025, the 100% rate applies. If a client placed property in service in early 2025 before OBBBA, they may need to file an amended return or make a §168(k) election change to capture the full benefit. Consult IRS Notice 2026-11 for the specific election procedures.

Bonus Depreciation Timeline — Before and After OBBBA
Year Placed in ServiceBonus Depreciation Rate (Pre-OBBBA)Bonus Depreciation Rate (Post-OBBBA)
202380%80% (OBBBA enacted as Public Law 119-21 on July 4, 2025)
202460%60% (OBBBA enacted as Public Law 119-21 on July 4, 2025)
2025 (pre-1/19)40%40%
2025 (post-1/19)40%100% (OBBBA)
2026 and beyond20% (scheduled)100% (permanent)

Source: IRS Notice 2026-11; OBBBA §168(k) as amended. Consult the notice for specific election procedures for 2025 property.

How a Cost Segregation Study Works: The Engineering Process

A quality cost segregation study is performed by a qualified engineer or cost segregation specialist — not an accountant alone. The IRS ATG specifically states that a study should be performed by someone with "knowledge of both the tax law (regarding property classifications) and construction." The engineering component is what gives the study its credibility and audit protection.

The process typically follows these steps:

Step 1 — Property review and document collection. The specialist collects the purchase agreement or construction cost documentation, architectural drawings, construction contracts and invoices, the closing statement, and prior depreciation schedules. A site visit is conducted for larger properties.

Step 2 — Component identification and classification. The engineer identifies every component of the building and classifies it into the appropriate recovery period: 5-year, 7-year, 15-year, 27.5-year, or 39-year property. This is the core of the study and requires both engineering knowledge (to identify the components) and tax knowledge (to classify them correctly).

Step 3 — Cost allocation. The cost of each component is determined using actual invoices where available, or estimated using Marshall & Swift cost data, RS Means, or other industry-standard construction cost databases where invoices are not available.

Step 4 — Report preparation. The specialist prepares a detailed engineering report documenting each reclassified component, its cost, and the basis for the shorter recovery period. The report should be sufficient to withstand IRS scrutiny and includes a revised depreciation schedule.

Step 5 — Tax return implementation. The practitioner implements the study on the tax return, claiming the accelerated depreciation and any applicable bonus depreciation. For look-back studies, a Form 3115 (Change in Accounting Method) is filed to claim the catch-up deduction.

What Gets Reclassified: Component Categories and Examples

The following table illustrates the types of building components that are commonly reclassified in a cost segregation study, along with their standard and reclassified recovery periods:

ComponentStandard RecoveryReclassified RecoveryBonus Eligible (2026)
Carpeting and specialty flooring39 years5 yearsYes — 100%
Decorative lighting fixtures39 years5 yearsYes — 100%
Specialized process equipment39 years5–7 yearsYes — 100%
Office furniture and fixtures39 years7 yearsYes — 100%
Parking lots and paving39 years15 yearsYes — 100%
Sidewalks and curbing39 years15 yearsYes — 100%
Landscaping and fencing39 years15 yearsYes — 100%
Exterior signage39 years15 yearsYes — 100%
Structural components (walls, roof, HVAC, plumbing)39 years39 years (no change)No
Residential rental components27.5 years5–15 years (personal property and land improvements)Yes — 100%

Real Numbers: What Cost Segregation Saves on a $1 Million Property

The following example illustrates the tax savings from a cost segregation study on a $1 million commercial office building, assuming 100% bonus depreciation in 2026 and a 37% marginal tax rate:

Cost Segregation Example — $1M Commercial Office Building
ScenarioYear 1 DepreciationYear 1 Tax Savings (37%)10-Year NPV Benefit
No cost segregation (39-year straight-line) $25,641 $9,487 Baseline
With cost segregation (25% reclassified, 100% bonus) $250,000 + $19,231 = $269,231 $99,615 +$65,000–$80,000 NPV
With cost segregation (35% reclassified, 100% bonus) $350,000 + $16,346 = $366,346 $135,548 +$90,000–$110,000 NPV

Assumes $1M building cost, 100% bonus depreciation on reclassified components, 37% marginal rate, 5% discount rate for NPV. Land value excluded. Consult a licensed tax professional for client-specific calculations.

Powered by Uncle Kam
KC

Run a cost segregation savings analysis for any client in under 3 minutes with Kam Code

Enter the property type, purchase price, year placed in service, and state — and Kam Code instantly calculates the estimated reclassification percentage, Year 1 bonus depreciation deduction, tax savings at the client's marginal rate, and the NPV benefit over the holding period. It also flags passive activity rule limitations, state conformity issues, and recapture risk. Present the analysis in the first meeting and close a $3,000–$8,000 cost segregation advisory engagement on the spot.

Cost Seg Savings Calculator Passive Activity Rule Check State Conformity Flag Recapture Risk Analysis Look-Back Study Estimator Client-Facing Summary

The Passive Activity Rule: The Most Important Limitation

The passive activity loss (PAL) rules under IRC §469 are the most significant limitation on cost segregation for many clients. The general rule is that passive activity losses can only offset passive activity income — they cannot offset wages, business income, or other active income. Since rental real estate is generally treated as a passive activity, cost segregation deductions from rental properties may be suspended and carried forward if the taxpayer has no passive income to offset.

There are three important exceptions that allow real estate losses to offset active income:

Exception 1: Real estate professional status. A taxpayer qualifies as a real estate professional under IRC §469(c)(7) if they spend more than 750 hours per year in real property trades or businesses AND more than 50% of their total personal services are in real property trades or businesses. Real estate professionals can deduct rental losses (including cost segregation deductions) against any income — wages, business income, investment income. This is one of the most powerful tax strategies available to real estate investors.

Exception 2: Active participation allowance. Taxpayers who actively participate in rental real estate can deduct up to $25,000 in rental losses against active income. This allowance phases out ratably between $100,000 and $150,000 of modified AGI. For clients with AGI above $150,000, this exception provides no benefit.

Exception 3: Short-term rental exception. If the average rental period for a property is 7 days or less (e.g., Airbnb, VRBO), the rental activity is not treated as a passive activity. This means cost segregation deductions from short-term rentals can offset active income without limitation. This exception has become increasingly important as short-term rental investing has grown.

Practitioner Note — Identifying Real Estate Professional Clients

Real estate professional status is one of the most valuable tax elections available, but it requires careful documentation. The taxpayer must maintain a contemporaneous log of hours spent in real property trades or businesses. Common qualifying activities include: property management, leasing, development, construction, acquisition, and brokerage. W-2 employees who work in real estate can qualify if they meet the hour tests. Spouses can combine hours only if they file jointly AND the spouse materially participates in the rental activities. Always document the hour election in the client's permanent file and prepare for potential IRS scrutiny.

Look-Back Studies: Claiming Missed Depreciation Without Amending Returns

One of the most powerful — and underutilized — aspects of cost segregation is the ability to perform a look-back study on properties placed in service in prior years. Under Rev. Proc. 2004-11, a taxpayer can claim all missed depreciation from prior years as a single catch-up deduction in the current year, without filing amended returns for each prior year.

The catch-up deduction is claimed as a §481(a) adjustment on Form 3115 (Application for Change in Accounting Method). The entire amount of missed depreciation from all prior years is deducted in the current year. For a client who has owned a $2 million building for 10 years without a cost segregation study, the catch-up deduction could be $200,000–$400,000 or more — all in a single year.

The look-back study is particularly valuable for clients who: (1) acquired properties before cost segregation was widely known, (2) are now in a higher tax bracket than when they acquired the property, (3) have recently become real estate professionals (unlocking passive losses), or (4) have passive income from other sources that can absorb the deductions.

Real estate investors in your area need a cost segregation advisor.
Uncle Kam's Marketplace connects real estate investors who need cost segregation advisory with tax professionals who can deliver results. Join and grow your practice with pre-qualified real estate clients.
Join the Marketplace →

Depreciation Recapture: The Risk Every Practitioner Must Explain

Cost segregation accelerates deductions today but creates a tax liability on sale through depreciation recapture. There are two types of recapture that apply to cost segregation property:

§1245 recapture. When personal property (5-year and 7-year) that was depreciated using MACRS or bonus depreciation is sold, the gain attributable to the depreciation taken is recaptured as ordinary income. This means the tax rate on the recaptured amount is the taxpayer's ordinary income rate (up to 37%), not the preferential capital gains rate (0%, 15%, or 20%).

§1250 recapture (unrecaptured §1250 gain). For real property, the gain attributable to depreciation taken is taxed at a maximum rate of 25% (the unrecaptured §1250 gain rate), rather than the 0%/15%/20% long-term capital gains rate. This applies to the straight-line depreciation taken on the structural components of the building.

The recapture risk does not eliminate the benefit of cost segregation — the time value of money means that deductions taken today are worth more than deductions taken in the future. But practitioners must explain the recapture risk to clients, particularly those who may sell the property in the near term. The best candidates for cost segregation are clients who plan to hold the property long-term, exchange into another property via §1031, or have offsetting losses.

State Conformity to Federal Bonus Depreciation — 2026

State conformity to federal bonus depreciation varies significantly and can dramatically affect the net benefit of cost segregation for clients in non-conforming states. Always check state-specific rules before presenting cost segregation savings estimates to clients.

StateConforms to Federal Bonus DepreciationState TreatmentPractitioner Note
CaliforniaNoNo bonus depreciation; uses CA MACRSMust add back federal bonus depreciation on CA return. Significant state tax impact for CA real estate owners.
New YorkYesConforms to federalNY generally conforms to federal depreciation. NYC may have additional considerations.
New JerseyNoNo bonus depreciation; uses NJ MACRSNJ does not conform to federal bonus depreciation. Must add back on NJ return.
TexasN/ANo state income taxNo state income tax — bonus depreciation irrelevant for state purposes. Federal savings are the full benefit.
FloridaN/ANo state income taxNo state income tax. Federal savings are the full benefit. Excellent jurisdiction for cost segregation.
IllinoisPartial50% bonus depreciation (state)IL allows 50% bonus depreciation. Federal savings are partially replicated at the state level.
PennsylvaniaNoNo bonus depreciation; straight-line onlyPA requires straight-line depreciation for state purposes. Significant state tax impact.
WashingtonN/ANo state income taxNo state income tax. Federal savings are the full benefit.
Kam Code Ready to present this analysis to your client? Kam Code generates the complete cost segregation savings analysis, passive activity rule check, state conformity flag, and recapture risk summary in under 3 minutes. Open Kam Code →

Frequently Asked Questions — Cost Segregation

These are the questions practitioners and real estate investors most commonly ask about cost segregation studies. Every answer is based on current IRC authority and 2026 IRS guidance.

What is a cost segregation study?
A cost segregation study is an engineering-based tax analysis that identifies and reclassifies components of a building from the standard 39-year (commercial) or 27.5-year (residential) depreciation period to shorter recovery periods of 5, 7, or 15 years. This accelerates depreciation deductions into the early years of ownership, improving cash flow and reducing current-year tax liability. The strategy is authorized under IRC §168 and endorsed by the IRS in its Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide.
How much can a cost segregation study save in taxes?
A cost segregation study on a $1 million commercial property can generate $50,000–$150,000 in additional first-year deductions, depending on the property type and the percentage of components reclassified. With 100% bonus depreciation restored under OBBBA (IRS Notice 2026-11), all reclassified personal property and 15-year land improvements can be deducted in full in the year placed in service. At a 37% marginal rate, that is $18,500–$55,500 in tax savings in year one alone.
Is 100% bonus depreciation available in 2026?
Yes. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation for qualifying property. IRS Notice 2026-11 (January 2026) confirms that property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025 qualifies for 100% bonus depreciation under IRC §168(k). This is a significant change from the the prior phase-down (now eliminated by OBBBA) schedule that had reduced bonus depreciation to 40% for property placed in service in 2025 before OBBBA enactment.
What properties qualify for cost segregation?
Any real property used in a trade or business or held for investment qualifies for cost segregation. This includes commercial buildings, office buildings, retail centers, warehouses, apartment complexes, hotels, restaurants, and medical facilities. New construction, acquisitions, and renovations all qualify. There is no IRS minimum property value, but the practical threshold for cost-effectiveness is typically $500,000 or more.
What is the passive activity rule limitation for cost segregation?
Under IRC §469, passive activity losses generally cannot offset active income. Real estate rental activities are typically passive, which means cost segregation deductions may be suspended and carried forward if the taxpayer has no passive income to offset. Exceptions include: real estate professionals (750 hours, more than 50% of personal services in real property trades), active participation ($25,000 allowance, phases out between $100,000–$150,000 AGI), and short-term rentals with average stay of 7 days or less.
Can cost segregation be done retroactively?
Yes. A look-back study under Rev. Proc. 2004-11 allows taxpayers to claim missed depreciation on properties placed in service in prior years without amending prior returns. The catch-up deduction is claimed as a §481(a) adjustment on Form 3115 in the current year. For a client who has owned a $2 million building for 10 years, the catch-up deduction could be $200,000–$400,000 or more — all in a single year.
Does California conform to federal bonus depreciation?
No. California does not conform to federal bonus depreciation under IRC §168(k). California taxpayers must add back the federal bonus depreciation and depreciate the asset using California's own depreciation rules (generally MACRS without bonus). This significantly reduces the state-level tax benefit of cost segregation for California real estate owners. However, the federal tax savings are still substantial.
What is depreciation recapture and how does it affect cost segregation?
When a property with accelerated depreciation is sold, the IRS recaptures the tax benefit through §1245 recapture (ordinary income rates on personal property depreciation) and §1250 recapture (25% rate on unrecaptured real property depreciation). Cost segregation accelerates deductions now but creates recapture on sale. The strategy is most beneficial when the client plans to hold the property long-term, exchange into another property via §1031, or has offsetting losses.
What is the ROI on a cost segregation study?
The ROI on a cost segregation study is typically 5:1 to 10:1 or higher. A study on a $1 million property might cost $5,000–$10,000 and generate $50,000–$150,000 in additional first-year deductions. At a 37% marginal rate, that is $18,500–$55,500 in tax savings in year one alone. The study pays for itself many times over, particularly with 100% bonus depreciation available in 2026.
Can cost segregation be used with a 1031 exchange?
Yes, but with important considerations. When a property with accelerated depreciation is exchanged in a §1031 like-kind exchange, the depreciation recapture is deferred along with the gain. The replacement property inherits the carryover basis and depreciation history of the relinquished property. A new cost segregation study can be performed on the replacement property to accelerate depreciation on the portion of the new property's basis above the carryover basis.
What is the IRS audit risk for cost segregation?
Cost segregation studies performed by qualified engineers following the IRS Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide (2004) have a low audit risk. The IRS accepts cost segregation as a legitimate tax planning strategy. The key to audit protection is a well-documented engineering report that clearly identifies each reclassified component, its cost, and the basis for the shorter recovery period. Studies performed by non-engineers or without proper documentation carry higher audit risk.
What is a partial asset disposition and how does it relate to cost segregation?
A partial asset disposition (PAD) allows taxpayers to deduct the remaining undepreciated basis of a structural component that is replaced (e.g., a roof, HVAC system, or flooring). When combined with a cost segregation study, PAD can generate significant additional deductions when a property is renovated. The cost segregation study identifies the components being replaced, and the PAD election allows the remaining basis of those components to be written off immediately.
Is a cost segregation study worth it for a $500,000 property?
At $500,000, a cost segregation study is typically borderline cost-effective. The study cost ($3,000–$6,000) may be justified if the property has a high percentage of personal property and land improvements (e.g., a restaurant or hotel), the owner is in a high tax bracket, and the owner has passive income to offset. For a standard office building at $500,000, the study may generate $50,000–$100,000 in reclassified assets, producing $18,500–$37,000 in tax savings at a 37% rate — a strong ROI.
How does cost segregation interact with the QBI deduction?
Cost segregation deductions reduce QBI (qualified business income) for purposes of the §199A deduction. This can reduce the QBI deduction in the year the cost segregation deductions are taken. However, the direct tax savings from the accelerated depreciation typically far exceed the reduction in the QBI deduction. For real estate professionals and active participants, the net tax benefit of cost segregation is almost always positive even after accounting for the QBI impact.
What is the §179 deduction and how does it relate to cost segregation?
Section 179 allows businesses to immediately expense the cost of qualifying property (up to $1,220,000 in 2026) rather than depreciating it over time. Cost segregation and §179 are complementary strategies — cost segregation identifies which components qualify for shorter recovery periods, and §179 can be used to immediately expense those components. However, §179 has limitations: it cannot create a loss, it phases out for businesses with more than $3,050,000 in asset additions, and it does not apply to residential rental property.
Can cost segregation be used on a rental property?
Yes. Cost segregation can be used on residential rental properties (27.5-year recovery) as well as commercial properties (39-year recovery). For residential rentals, the reclassified personal property and land improvements are still eligible for 5, 7, and 15-year recovery periods and 100% bonus depreciation. However, the passive activity rules apply — the deductions may be suspended unless the taxpayer qualifies as a real estate professional or meets the active participation exception.
What documentation is needed for a cost segregation study?
The cost segregation specialist will need: (1) the purchase price or construction cost, (2) the closing statement or settlement statement, (3) architectural drawings and construction plans (if available), (4) construction contracts and invoices, (5) the depreciation schedule from prior returns, and (6) photos of the property. The more documentation available, the more accurate and defensible the study will be.
How long does a cost segregation study take?
A cost segregation study typically takes 2–6 weeks, depending on the property type, size, and availability of construction documents. The study is performed by a qualified engineer or cost segregation specialist who reviews architectural drawings, construction contracts, and the property itself. The deliverable is a detailed engineering report that supports the reclassified asset lives and can withstand IRS scrutiny.
What is the IRS Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide?
The IRS Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide (ATG) is the IRS's own guide for auditing cost segregation studies. Published in 2004 and updated periodically, the ATG describes the IRS's expectations for a quality cost segregation study, including the qualifications of the preparer, the methodology used, and the documentation required. A cost segregation study that follows the ATG methodology is well-positioned to withstand IRS scrutiny.
What is the difference between cost segregation and §179?
Cost segregation is an engineering study that identifies and reclassifies building components into shorter depreciation periods, making them eligible for bonus depreciation. §179 is a separate election that allows immediate expensing of qualifying property up to the annual limit ($1,220,000 in 2026). The key differences: §179 has an annual dollar limit and cannot create a loss; bonus depreciation (triggered by cost segregation) has no dollar limit and can create a loss that carries forward. For most real estate clients, bonus depreciation is more powerful than §179.
How do I set up a cost segregation study for a client who recently acquired a commercial property?
To set up a cost segregation study for a newly acquired commercial property, first gather detailed construction or purchase documentation, including blueprints, invoices, and closing statements. Engage a qualified professional with engineering and tax expertise to identify and classify assets into the appropriate recovery periods under §168. The study should quantify personal property and land improvements eligible for accelerated depreciation, ensuring compliance with the 2026 bonus depreciation rules under §168(k). Finally, incorporate the study results into the client's tax filings, adjusting depreciation schedules accordingly.
What are the critical steps to take when filing a cost segregation study mid-year for a property placed in service in a prior tax year?
When filing a cost segregation study mid-year for a property placed in service in a prior year, the taxpayer must consider making a Section 481(a) adjustment to account for the change in depreciation method. This involves filing Form 3115 to request a change in accounting method, which can be done automatically or with IRS consent depending on circumstances. Ensure the study is completed with supporting documentation and detailed asset classification, aligning with §168 regulations. The adjustment spreads out the cumulative depreciation difference over the remaining recovery period, avoiding audit risks related to improper timing.
What audit triggers should tax professionals be aware of when a client claims accelerated depreciation from a cost segregation study?
Audit triggers often include large or unusual depreciation deductions, especially when accelerated through a cost segregation study. The IRS may scrutinize the study’s methodology, asset classification, and supporting documentation to verify compliance with §168 and related regulations. Inconsistent or poorly documented studies, or those lacking engineering-based analysis, are red flags. Also, failure to file Form 3115 when changing depreciation methods can increase audit risk. Maintaining a defensible, detailed report prepared by qualified specialists is critical for mitigating audit exposure.
What documentation is required to substantiate a cost segregation study in the event of an IRS examination?
Substantiation requires a comprehensive engineering-based report detailing the asset breakdown and cost allocations, including supporting invoices, construction contracts, and appraisal reports. The study should identify assets classified into 5-, 7-, 15-, and 39-year recovery periods per §168. Documentation must also include the methodology used, personnel qualifications, and calculation of depreciation amounts. Retaining contemporaneous records and demonstrating adherence to IRS guidelines, including compliance with §481(a) adjustments if applicable, is essential for defense in an examination.
How should a tax professional advise a client who owns both residential rental and nonresidential real estate regarding cost segregation benefits?
For clients owning both residential rental (27.5-year recovery) and nonresidential real estate (39-year recovery), cost segregation can accelerate depreciation on both property types by reclassifying assets into shorter lives, such as 5-, 7-, or 15-year categories. However, special attention must be paid to the different recovery periods under §168(c) and the passive activity loss rules under §469, which may limit the utilization of accelerated deductions. A tailored approach should evaluate the client’s income, passive activity status, and potential benefits of bonus depreciation under §168(k) to optimize tax savings across property types.
How does cost segregation compare to using Section 179 expensing for real estate assets in 2026?
Cost segregation accelerates depreciation deductions by reallocating building costs into shorter-lived asset classes but does not create new deductions, while Section 179 allows immediate expensing of qualifying personal property up to $2,560,000 in 2026, phased out dollar-for-dollar above $4,090,000 of placed-in-service property. However, most real property components do not qualify for Section 179 expensing, which is generally limited to tangible personal property, certain land improvements, and qualified leasehold improvements. Combining cost segregation with Section 179 requires careful asset classification to maximize immediate expensing without triggering limitations.
What questions should I ask a client when determining if a cost segregation study is appropriate for their property portfolio?
Key questions include: What is the acquisition date and cost basis of each property? Have there been recent renovations or improvements that might qualify for partial asset dispositions? Does the client have sufficient taxable income to absorb accelerated depreciation benefits without triggering passive activity loss limitations per §469? Are detailed construction or purchase records available to support a study? Finally, what is the client’s long-term investment horizon and tax planning objectives? These inquiries help assess the timing, feasibility, and potential tax impact of a cost segregation strategy.

Ready to Reduce Your Tax Burden?

Our tax advisors specialize in helping professionals and business owners implement these strategies. Book a free strategy call to see how much you could save.

Learn How to Implement This
Professional Disclaimer

The information on this page is intended for licensed tax professionals (CPAs, EAs, and tax attorneys) and is provided for educational and research purposes only. Tax law is complex and fact-specific — all strategies discussed are subject to limitations, phase-outs, and conditions that may not apply to every client situation. Practitioners should independently verify all information against current IRS guidance, Treasury Regulations, and applicable state law before advising clients. This content does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The Real Estate Tax Opportunity Is Massive

Real Estate Investors Are Leaving $50,000–$500,000 on the Table. Be the Advisor Who Finds It.

Uncle Kam is a marketplace that connects real estate investors who need cost segregation advisory with tax professionals who can deliver results. Join the marketplace and grow your practice with pre-qualified real estate clients who are ready to pay for advisory services.

Free for Licensed Tax Professionals — Always
Like Thomson Reuters Wolters Kluwer TaxGPT But Free

The Tax Research Platform
You’ve Been Looking For.

The same caliber of research tool that firms pay $3,000–$10,000/year for — IRC-cited strategies, IRS notice guides, and client playbooks — completely free for licensed tax professionals. Use it to save clients more money and charge more for advisory.

  • 300+ IRC-cited strategies with implementation steps — ready to use with clients today
  • 200+ profession-specific client playbooks — walk in prepared to every meeting
  • 80+ IRS notice response guides — handle CP2000s, audits, and collections with confidence
  • Turn research into revenue — advisors using this close $3k–$10k engagements per client

Taxpayers use a separate portal. This platform is exclusively for licensed CPAs, EAs, and tax attorneys.

300+ Tax Strategies · 100+ IRS Form Guides · 200+ Client Playbooks · Always Free
Free forever for licensed tax professionals. Uncle Kam serves both tax pros and taxpayers — this portal is the tax pro side.
Free forever for licensed tax professionals. Uncle Kam serves both tax pros and taxpayers — this portal is the tax pro side.
Free access to 300+ tax strategies Join the Marketplace →