How LLC Owners Save on Taxes in 2026

Tax Intelligence Strategy Library Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) IRC §408(d)(8) Charitable Giving Strategy Updated April 2026

Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) from IRA: How Clients Age 70½ and Older Can Give to Charity Tax-Free and Reduce Their RMD Under IRC §408(d)(8) in 2026

The Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) is one of the most underutilized tax strategies for clients age 70½ and older who have significant IRA balances, make charitable contributions, and take the standard deduction. A QCD allows the IRA owner to transfer up to $108,000 (2026 limit) directly from their IRA to a qualified charity, excluding the distribution from gross income entirely. Unlike a regular IRA withdrawal followed by a charitable contribution, the QCD never enters the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income — which means it does not trigger Medicare premium surcharges (IRMAA), does not increase the taxable portion of Social Security benefits, and does not reduce the deductibility of other itemized deductions. For clients who take the standard deduction and would otherwise receive no tax benefit from charitable contributions, the QCD is the only way to get a tax benefit from charitable giving. This guide covers the eligibility rules, the annual limit, the interaction with RMDs, the SECURE 2.0 changes, and the specific client profiles where the QCD produces the greatest benefit.

$108,000
2026 annual QCD limit per taxpayer (indexed for inflation under SECURE 2.0) — married couples can each make a QCD of up to $108,000 from their respective IRAs, for a combined maximum of $216,000 per year
Age 70½
Minimum age to make a QCD — the taxpayer must have reached age 70½ by the date of the distribution; this is not the same as the RMD beginning date (age 73 under SECURE 2.0), so clients can make QCDs for 2.5 years before RMDs begin
$0 AGI
Impact of QCD on adjusted gross income — the QCD is excluded from gross income entirely, unlike a regular IRA withdrawal followed by a charitable deduction; this is the critical distinction that makes the QCD superior for clients who take the standard deduction or are subject to AGI-based phase-outs
$53,000
2026 one-time QCD to a split-interest entity (charitable remainder trust, charitable gift annuity, or pooled income fund) — a new provision under SECURE 2.0 allows a one-time QCD of up to $53,000 to these entities, indexed for inflation
QCD Authority: IRC §408(d)(8) 2026 QCD Limit: $108,000 (indexed under SECURE 2.0) One-Time Split-Interest QCD: $53,000 (2026, SECURE 2.0 §307) RMD Beginning Age: 73 (SECURE 2.0 §107) QCD Eligible Age: 70½ (IRC §408(d)(8)(B))
QCD AuthorityIRC §408(d)(8)
RMD RulesIRC §401(a)(9)
SECURE 2.0 QCDSECURE 2.0 §307
Charitable DeductionIRC §170
IRMAA Thresholds42 U.S.C. §1395r
SS TaxationIRC §86

Why the QCD Is Superior to a Regular IRA Withdrawal + Charitable Deduction

The most important concept for practitioners to understand — and communicate to clients — is why the QCD is superior to simply withdrawing money from the IRA and then making a charitable contribution. The answer lies in the difference between an above-the-line exclusion and a below-the-line deduction.

When a client takes a regular IRA withdrawal, the distribution is included in gross income and increases adjusted gross income (AGI). If the client then makes a charitable contribution and itemizes deductions, the charitable deduction reduces taxable income but does not reduce AGI. The elevated AGI has consequences that the charitable deduction cannot undo:

  1. Medicare premium surcharges (IRMAA). Medicare Part B and Part D premiums are based on MAGI from 2 years prior. In 2026, IRMAA surcharges begin at MAGI over $106,000 single / $212,000 MFJ. A $50,000 IRA withdrawal that pushes a client over an IRMAA threshold can cost $2,000–$8,000 per year in additional Medicare premiums for 2 years.
  2. Increased taxation of Social Security benefits. Under IRC §86, up to 85% of Social Security benefits are taxable when MAGI exceeds $34,000 single / $44,000 MFJ. An IRA withdrawal that increases MAGI above these thresholds increases the taxable portion of Social Security benefits, creating a tax on the Social Security income that the charitable deduction cannot offset.
  3. Standard deduction vs. itemized deduction. In 2026, the standard deduction is $16,100 single / $32,200 MFJ (plus additional amounts for age 65+). Most clients over 70 take the standard deduction because their itemized deductions do not exceed it. A charitable contribution for a standard deduction filer produces zero tax benefit. A QCD produces a full tax benefit regardless of whether the client itemizes.
  4. Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT). Higher AGI from IRA withdrawals can push investment income above the NIIT threshold ($200,000 single / $250,000 MFJ), triggering the 3.8% NIIT on net investment income. The QCD avoids this by keeping AGI lower.

The QCD avoids all of these problems because the distribution is excluded from gross income entirely — it never appears on Line 4b of Form 1040 as taxable income.

QCD and Required Minimum Distributions: The Interaction

A QCD counts toward satisfying the taxpayer’s required minimum distribution (RMD) for the year. This is a critical planning point. Under SECURE 2.0, RMDs begin at age 73 (for individuals born in 1951 or later). The QCD age threshold is 70½, which means clients can make QCDs for 2.5 years before their RMDs begin. During this pre-RMD window, QCDs are a proactive strategy to reduce the IRA balance (and therefore future RMDs) while making charitable contributions tax-free.

Once RMDs begin, the QCD strategy becomes even more powerful. The QCD satisfies the RMD without the distribution being included in gross income. For a client with a $2 million IRA and an RMD of $80,000, a $80,000 QCD satisfies the entire RMD and excludes all $80,000 from gross income. The client has made an $80,000 charitable contribution with no tax cost beyond the reduction in IRA balance.

Important ordering rule: Under the IRS’s interpretation, QCDs are treated as coming from the first dollars distributed from the IRA in a given year. This means that if a client takes a regular IRA distribution before making a QCD in the same year, the regular distribution reduces the amount of the QCD that can satisfy the RMD. Practitioners should advise clients to make QCDs before taking any other IRA distributions in a given year.

Frequently Asked Questions

My client made a deductible IRA contribution in the year they turned 70½. Does this affect their QCD?

Yes — this is a trap that practitioners frequently miss. Under IRC §408(d)(8)(A), the QCD exclusion is reduced by the amount of IRA contributions made after age 70½ for which the taxpayer claimed a deduction. The reduction applies on a cumulative basis: if a client made $7,000 of deductible IRA contributions at age 71 and $7,000 at age 72, the first $14,000 of QCDs made in any subsequent year are not excluded from income — they are treated as regular taxable distributions. Only QCDs in excess of the cumulative post-70½ deductible contributions are excluded. Note: this rule applies only to deductible contributions, not nondeductible contributions. If the client made nondeductible IRA contributions after age 70½, those contributions do not reduce the QCD exclusion (but they do create basis in the IRA that must be tracked on Form 8606). Practical advice: advise clients age 70½ and older who are still working and making IRA contributions to make nondeductible contributions (or Roth contributions if eligible) rather than deductible traditional IRA contributions, to preserve the full QCD exclusion.

Can my client make a QCD to a donor-advised fund?

No — QCDs cannot be made to donor-advised funds (DAFs), supporting organizations, or private foundations. This is one of the most common client misconceptions. Under IRC §408(d)(8)(B)(i), a QCD must be made to an organization described in IRC §170(b)(1)(A) that is not a private foundation, a supporting organization described in §509(a)(3), or an organization that maintains a donor-advised fund. In practice, this means QCDs can be made to public charities (churches, hospitals, educational institutions, public foundations) but not to DAFs, private foundations, or supporting organizations. The reason for this restriction is that DAFs and private foundations do not make immediate use of the donated funds — the funds may sit in the DAF for years before being distributed to operating charities. Congress wanted QCDs to benefit operating charities directly. The practical implication for clients who use DAFs: they must choose between the QCD (direct to operating charity, excluded from income) and the DAF contribution (taxable IRA withdrawal, then deductible contribution to DAF if they itemize). For most clients who take the standard deduction, the QCD to an operating charity is superior. For clients who itemize and want the flexibility of the DAF, the regular withdrawal + DAF contribution may be preferable if the charitable deduction provides a tax benefit.

How is the QCD reported on Form 1040? The IRS instructions are confusing.

The QCD reporting is counterintuitive and frequently done incorrectly. Here is the correct procedure: (1) The IRA custodian will issue a Form 1099-R showing the total distribution from the IRA, including the QCD amount. The 1099-R does not separately identify the QCD — it shows the full distribution amount in Box 1 and the taxable amount in Box 2a (which may show the full amount or be blank). (2) On Form 1040, Line 4a, enter the total IRA distribution (the amount from Box 1 of the 1099-R). (3) On Form 1040, Line 4b, enter the taxable portion of the distribution (total distribution minus the QCD amount). (4) Write “QCD” next to Line 4b to alert the IRS that the difference between Line 4a and Line 4b is a QCD. There is no separate form or schedule for the QCD — the notation “QCD” next to Line 4b is the only required documentation on the return. However, the taxpayer must maintain a contemporaneous written acknowledgment from the charity confirming the donation, as required by IRC §170(f)(8). The acknowledgment must state the amount of the contribution and that no goods or services were provided in exchange (or the value of any goods or services provided). Without this acknowledgment, the QCD exclusion can be disallowed on audit.

More Tax Planning FAQs

What is the IRS audit risk for this strategy?
The IRS audit rate for individual returns is approximately 0.4% overall, but increases significantly for returns with Schedule C income, large deductions, or specific strategies. Proper documentation is the best defense against an audit. Keep contemporaneous records, maintain written agreements, and ensure all deductions are supported by receipts and business purpose documentation.
How does this strategy interact with the alternative minimum tax (AMT)?
Many tax strategies that reduce regular income tax can trigger or increase AMT liability. Common AMT triggers include: ISO exercises, large state tax deductions, accelerated depreciation, and passive activity losses. Taxpayers should model both regular tax and AMT before implementing aggressive tax strategies to ensure the net benefit is positive.
What is the statute of limitations for IRS assessment of this strategy?
The IRS generally has three years from the later of the return due date or filing date to assess additional tax. If the taxpayer omits more than 25% of gross income, the statute is extended to six years. There is no statute of limitations for fraudulent returns or failure to file. Taxpayers should retain tax records for at least seven years to cover the extended statute of limitations.
How should this strategy be documented to withstand IRS scrutiny?
Documentation is the cornerstone of any tax strategy. Maintain contemporaneous records (created at the time of the transaction), written agreements, business purpose statements, and receipts. For strategies involving related parties, ensure all transactions are at arm’s length and documented with fair market value support. The burden of proof is on the taxpayer to substantiate deductions.
What is the economic substance doctrine and how does it apply?
The economic substance doctrine (§7701(o)) requires that transactions have both objective economic substance (a reasonable possibility of profit) and subjective business purpose (a non-tax reason for the transaction). Transactions that lack economic substance are disregarded for tax purposes, and the 40% strict liability penalty applies. Legitimate tax planning strategies must have genuine business purposes beyond tax reduction.
How does this strategy affect state income taxes?
Federal tax strategies do not always produce the same results at the state level. Some states do not conform to federal tax law changes (e.g., bonus depreciation, QSBS exclusion). Taxpayers should model the state tax impact of any federal tax strategy, especially in high-tax states like California, New York, and New Jersey. Some strategies may save federal taxes while increasing state taxes.
What is the step-transaction doctrine and how does it apply?
The step-transaction doctrine allows the IRS to collapse a series of related transactions into a single transaction if the intermediate steps have no independent significance. This doctrine is used to prevent taxpayers from using artificial multi-step transactions to achieve tax results that would not be available in a single transaction. Legitimate tax planning strategies should have independent business purposes for each step.
How does this strategy interact with the passive activity loss rules?
Passive activity losses (§469) can only offset passive income. Active business income, wages, and portfolio income are not passive. Real estate rental income is generally passive unless the taxpayer qualifies as a Real Estate Professional. Passive losses that cannot be used currently are suspended and carried forward to offset future passive income or recognized when the passive activity is disposed of in a fully taxable transaction.
What is the at-risk limitation and how does it affect deductions?
The at-risk limitation (§465) limits deductions to the amount the taxpayer has at risk in the activity. At-risk amounts include cash invested, property contributed, and amounts borrowed for which the taxpayer is personally liable. Non-recourse debt (except qualified non-recourse financing for real estate) does not increase the at-risk amount. Losses in excess of the at-risk amount are suspended and carried forward.
How does this strategy affect the taxpayer’s basis in the business?
Basis tracking is essential for pass-through entities (S-Corps, partnerships). Contributions increase basis; distributions and losses decrease basis. A shareholder or partner cannot deduct losses in excess of their basis. Distributions in excess of basis are taxable as capital gains. Taxpayers should maintain a basis schedule and update it annually to track the impact of income, losses, and distributions.

Ready to Reduce Your Tax Burden?

Our tax advisors specialize in helping professionals and business owners implement these strategies. Book a free strategy call to see how much you could save.

Book A Strategy Call With A Tax Advisor
A client who gives $50,000/year to charity and takes the standard deduction saves $18,500+ in federal tax by using a QCD instead of a regular IRA withdrawal

Be the Practitioner Who Finds the QCD Opportunity. Uncle Kam Connects Retirees With Tax Strategists Who Know IRC §408(d)(8).

Free access to 300+ tax strategies Join the Marketplace →